Analysis of the Speech of Arun Jaitley at Annual
General Meeting of IBA On 28-09-2015
by
Pannvalan
Ads by Google
HIGHLIGHTS OF HIS SPEECH
MY COMMENTS
Government is working on a slew of sectoral reforms,
including a new law on fast track arbitration, in a bid to address
the stressed areas of the banking sector.
FM has spoken about ‘Exit Policy’ that is in final
stages of preparation and the draft will be put out for
deliberations early next month. He also said the proposed new
Arbitration Law provides for Fast Track Arbitration with one member
Arbitration Board, with a mandate to complete the entire process
within six months.
Shri Jaitley also said the Dispute Resolution
Tribunals (DRTs)’s working was being speeded up by moving most of
the transactions online.
Will that suffice? How the government is going to
ensure that these companies will fulfil their written commitments
made at the time of their execution of an MOU with the respective
governments (centre/state)?
What is the government planning to prevent huge pile
up of NPAs in public sector banks? Do they have any workable idea
in this regard?
The Government is aware of the challenges faced by
the Public Sector Banks (PSBs) and measures were being taken to
address each one of them.
He has not specified what type of challenges he
refers to. Going by the announcement/decision to dilute of
government’s share-holding in IDBI, we may presume that NDA
government wants to test the waters, so that they can implement the
same strategy(?) in respect of other PSBs too. Some mergers may
also be on the cards. Unless a clear cut road map is laid out
before us, we cannot make any specific comments on this issue.
Sectors such as steel, power, highways and discoms
were mainly responsible for the stress in Public Sector Banks (PSBs).
Yes, agreed. What about stressed assets in other
sectors like Telecom, Infrastructure (other than Highways), Civil
Aviation, Textiles etc.? What about the large scale scandals in CDRs,
involving large companies from any sector? What steps the
government has taken to check the director/s of one defaulter
company holding the post of director in other companies? What is
the role of Company Law Board vis-à-vis SEBI and Ministry of
Corporate Affairs (read as political establishment)? Has he ever
examined these points in depth?
Very few States had carried-out power sector reforms
and the situation would not improve, unless the users were made to
pay for the electricity consumed.
I agree to some extent. But, will he comment about
the rolling out the red carpet by various states to private power
producers, who express their intent to invest very huge amount
running into hundreds/thousands of crores of Rupee? Why do these
states offer vast tracts of land at throw away prices (through land
acquisition route many a time) to such investors? Why shall they be
offered tax holidays and exemptions/relaxations from the age old
labour laws? What is the amount of sacrifice made by these states
over a period of time? Will he bring out a ‘White Paper’ containing
full details, company/investor wise?
Problems of the steel sector are on account of
external factors, where cheap imports are hurting the domestic
industry.
This is only one side of the truth. Is he willing to
openly discuss the stories of companies like Essar Steel, POSCO etc.
who have their manufacturing bases in other countries too? Are they
not offered cheap land and coal for their factories and many other
concessions by the states concerned?
But do these companies start their commercial
operations as per schedule? Do these companies create more
employment opportunities as promised by them? Do they meet their
export obligations without fail?
.
Ads by Google
HIGHLIGHTS OF HIS SPEECH
MY COMMENTS
The Public Sector Banks (PSBs) have to be given a lot
of independence. Of course, they will be carrying-out the
developmental agenda of the Government, but their administration has
to be based purely on banking considerations.
In reality does this happen? Let the FM demonstrate
the truthfulness of his promise, by withdrawing Finance Ministry’s
Nominee and RBI Nominee on the Banks’ Board, as a first step. Then,
in appointments to the top slots of the banks, GOI shall not
interfere. A committee comprising of representatives from RBI, CVC,
SCOPE, ICAI and retired bankers must be constituted for this
purpose. Cases of corruption at high places, in which banks also
have a role, must be probed and necessary action quickly.
Government may consider reducing its stake in Public
Sector Banks (PSBs) to 52 per cent, giving additional financial
strength to banks themselves. “We have come-up with a
re-capitalization programme for the next four years and hopefully
this would induct capital strength in to the banks and improve their
capacity”.
The time is not yet ideal for the government to
dilute its shareholding in PSBs. Regarding the recapitalization
programme proposed, I wish to wait and see how it is going to take
shape.
A high level committee headed by Justice A P Shah,
former Chairperson, Law Commission is looking into the options
available for Public Sector Banks (PSBs) to recruit the best talent
from the market. Efforts are on to give shape to the Banking
Bureau and to professionalize all personnel issues.
I do not support the move to induct personnel from
the private sector – including the private financial institutions –
at top positions in public sector banks. First, the organisational
culture of PSBs is totally different. Secondly, their focus and
strategies hugely vary from one bank to another. Thirdly, the
government has a great influence on their functions – Lending, HRD
(recruitment, placement and promotion), Branch Expansion and
Closure, Investments etc. either directly or through RBI. Unless
the government stops exercising too much of interference in the
affairs of public sector banks, the so called ‘professionalism’ will
not become a reality in PSBs; it will remain a dream only.
Mr Jaitley however opined that the brick and mortar
branches may probably lose some relevance in future with alternative
internet based channels emerging.
I too agree that the importance of ‘brick and mortar
branches’ will come down in due course of time, but they will not
lose their relevance nor vanish, given the low literacy levels –
that too financial literacy – and the large part of the population
still living in rural areas and small towns (with less than 50,000
population).
So, technology can only play a supportive and
supplementary role here. Technology cannot become a substitute for
‘brick and mortar’ banking in the next 20 to 30 years.
You can give your feedback / comments about this Article. Please give only relevant comments as irrelevant comments are
waste of time for yourself and our other readers.