FINANCIAL INCLUSION - ANOTHER SUICIDAL ACTIVITY BY BANKS?
By
Danendra Jain <dkjain49709@rediffmail.com>
What happened in 1970s and 1980s:
In seventies and eighties there was huge pressure from government of India and Reserve Bank of India on Public sector banks for opening of branches in rural areas so as to cover all villages. As per policy of Service Area Approach introduced by RBI each branch of a bank had to serve 15 villages and cover 10000 of population. There used to be Block Level Banker’s Committee (BLBC) constituted by Lead Bank Manager, Branch Managers of all banks in the block and block level officials to prepare an annual credit outlay plan for the year for the service area and monitor its implementation. Thereafter District Level consultative Committee (DLCC) and State Level Banker’s Committee (SLBC) were constituted to monitor the quality and quantity of progress.
But unfortunately this entire exercise in the real field proved formal
and futile during last thirty years of its existence.
Village level, District
level and State level plans formulated by BLBC, DLCC and SLBC proved a
futile exercise so far as the real welfare of villages, elimination of
poverty and idea of social welfare is concerned.
This is a bitter truth that all these plans failed miserably and
position of villagers did not improve despite several poverty
alleviation programes undertaken by PSU banks in one name or the other
during last for decades. Officials of banks and state government offices
still complete these formalities of conducting meetings, formulating
annual plans and there submitting the report to Banking Division and RBI
but there is none at field level branches of banks or block offices to
take care of plan and its execution.
Economic Reforms of 1990s:
In the year 1991 government of India adopted the path of economic
reformation in line with global policy of liberalization, privatization
and globalization (LPG). Banking reformation also was also planned and
put into action under the leadership of the then Finance Minister Mr.
Manmohan Singh. Banks were given huge freedom, rates were deregulated,
licensing policy was reframed, private banks were opened and gradually
banks changed their
working style from traditional social banking and mass banking to Class
banking, from social service entity to profit making unit. In nineties,
several branches of banks were closed or turned into satellite branch
only because there were unable to earn profit.
Villagers who lived in the service area of closed branches were forced
to contact other branch of that bank at farther place or to contact some
other nearby bank for financial assistance or for any banking operation.
During this period not only poor villagers were discarded and left at
the mercy of traditional money lenders for exploitation, but even
banks were also constrained
to write off huge amount of loans and advances disbursed in the
villages.
Government of India
had to infuse capital several times to make PSU banks strong enough to
compete with global
banks. Merger of banks were point of debate at all level so that their
lending capacity may increase and they may be able to finance to bigger
and bigger project .In brief the choice of bankers became top
industrialists and top traders and not poor villagers. Banks now
consider wholesale and bulk lending instead of retail lending. Ambiance
of most of the branches have been changed and decorated to suit rich
society and to make it comparable with private and foreign banks which
were by birth made to serve rich class people.
Banks were nationalized in 1969 by Late Indira Gandhi to make banks
accessible for poor villagers.
Unfortunately, poor
villagers have again been thrown out of bank’s branches during last
twenty years of reformation in banking. In the new set up poor villagers
are directed towards Micro Finance Institutes (MFI) or advised to come
through newly formed broker called as NGO or form their own Self Help
Group (SHG). Banks
gradually turned to non banking business like insurance, and demat
services to earn more and more profit by less and less staff because
they realized that profit earning by PSU banks competing with private
banks was not easy.
In the changed situation banks are trying to show false and cooked
profit by hiding their bad assets or selling their bad assets to ARCs or
by imposing service charges for every banking operation they do in the
bank.
Banks are trying to earn Non Interest Income because their Interest
Income has sharply come down due to unwarranted rate war declared by
government under the frame work of reformation policy. Profits of PSU
banks are facing continuous erosion due to increase in Non Performing
Assets and hence bankers are least interested in rural lending which
involves comparatively more manpower and enlarged network of branches.
Now after twenty
years of reformation RBI has once again realized that need of the hour
is to serve the villagers.
New word called as Financial Inclusion has become the slogan of bankers.
But as a matter of fact their all field activities indicate that
banks are bent upon
Financial Exclusion of poor villagers by directing them to MFI or to NGO
or to form SHG. Poor
people in villages and towns have now to depend on ATM and biometric
cards for cash deposits and cash payment and on MFI. NGOs and local
money lenders for availing loan facilities. Banks as also government of
India think it wise to make finance to MFI and NGOs in hundreds of
crores of rupees at base rate or at low rates and the ask MFI to make
finance to poor people at many times higher rates.
Financial Inclusion
is used merely for opening of No Frill accounts
and to serve the purpose of
UID (Uniform Identity Number). The word ‘Financial Inclusion’ is
frequently used by political leaders and government officials along with
bankers. But in fact
no real improvement of poor people has taken place during last twenty
years of reformation policy
initiated by the government
in the year 1991. It will not be an exaggeration to say that poor people
were better served during the period 1971 to 1990 (after nationalization
of banks in 1969). To add fuel to fire RBI is again putting thrust on
bank management to open more and more new branches to reach the level of
each Panchayat.
Bankers have burnt
their fingers in large scale expansion program under Service Area
Approach plan of seventies and again they are committing the same
blunder by opting unwarranted expansion of branch network to spread it
upto Panchayat level without increasing manpower to suit the need of
branch expansion. The new word ‘Financial inclusion’ is nothing but is
old wine in new bottle and this continue to make mockery of poor people.
Under the umbrella of reformation banks have stopped recruiting fresh
staffs to save staff cost and to earn more and more profit in line with
other capitalists who are exploiting Indians by way of labour
exploitation and by indulging in large scale profit making. Business of
banks have multiplied ten times during last five years but number of
staff working in banks have come down compared to what it was five years
ago inspite of addition of new branches and new businesses in banks. As
such employment opportunities available to educated youth are also
shrinking in the era of reformation.
Obviously we need to debate whether banks are serving poor people,
whether policy of capitalism adopted by Government of India in the name
of economic reformation suits to Indians environment and whether growth
of five percent of population of Indian is the real motto of the
government and the real purpose of GDP growth. We Indian have to ponder
over the prevailing policy of capitalism and discuss whether it is more
important or we have to revert back to the policy of socialism or to
adopt a middle path in unison with the policy of Mixed economy. Poor and
middle class of Indians who constitutes 95% of population cannot even
afford quality education, quality health care services, quick justice in
court and quality food in our country because rich and affluent class
have been given complete freedom to exploit consumer and earn profit
without any fear of administrative action under the policy framework of
reformation called as LPG. As such this large segment of society have to
depend on bank’s loan for all their essential needs food, health care,
education and so on.
Last but not the least PSU banks in general are running in acute
manpower shortage but still management of the bank is least inclined to
recruit fresh manpower to keep cost of establishment at the lowest.
Besides there is complete lack of devoted, talented and honest workers
due to increasing number of corrupt officers sitting at top post who
discourage good workers and hence the assets of the bank are undoubtedly
at stake and the health of the banks has to face is in way sound.
As such large
scale expansion undertaken by branches
may prove to be
suicidal activity
and the word
Financial Inclusion has become a laughing stock for common men. Neither
bankers nor poor people are happy and safe. Even banks are not safe
but more
confused because they are unable to decide which path they are actually
to go when government changes policy so frequently and in a impractical
way.
***
***December, 2010***
Important Notice : [The articles written by authors contains only the academic view of the writer and purely for discussions and updation of the knowledge of the bankers. The views expressed in the articles may not at all be subscribed by the organisation where the author is working and / or AllBankingSolutions.com]