|
KIND ATTENTION
YOUNGER GENERATION BANK EMPLOYEES
by
K BALASUBRAMANIAN
RETIRED UNDER VRS 2001 SCHEME PENSION OPTEE INDIAN BANK
From the ET news posted in the blog regarding wage
negotiation process it is very clear that Government / IBA is buying time
under one pretext or other in the name of load factor, costing pension etc
thereby creating frustration among the cadres. Also this amounts to
sidetracking from the real issue i.e. parity with Central Government
employees. If the IBA is going on delaying this process, at one time
UFBU will be forced to accept the package
already offered by IBA on 24 September 2009.
There is justification in getting pension for the
persons who were not opted earlier because of the intelligent calculation
that AIBOC / BEFI circulated advising the then younger employees to opt for
PF. However, the stand of the UFBU in regard to new
pension to new employees regarding cut off date of 01.04.2012 instead of IBA
s proposal of 01.04.2010 is immature.
Non acceptance of the new pension even to the future staff is one thing and
just getting it postponed to another two years is another thing. This lacks
conviction. Considering the carry forward load in the years to
come when the Central Government itself has opted for new pension to
its employees, where is the chance for bank men to get the scheme
undisturbed. This issue has to be addressed without prestige issue by the
leaders and cut off date of 01.04.2010 should be accepted as ALL
THE EMPLOYEES AS ON DATE IS GETTING PROTECTED. New employees are going to be
employed with higher merged basic pay . If this
is one hurdle means it is the fault of UFBU not IBA.
Having shooted out a beautiful letter to MOF by
AIBOC leadership seeking parity with central government officers , there
seems to be no follow up . There seems to be some unnoticed
agenda as SBI packed AIBOC and NCBE wants higher pay and they are not taking
new pension to new employees concept lightly. Not only the
existing difference in pay that persists should be protected but also the
equivalent amount of additional increase because of the unnecessary concept
of pension load to nationalized bank employees because of the second option
and pension to retirees who opted for PF , is delaying the issue.
Last time even on the strike day IBA
jocularly withdrew the offer already made and made a mockery of the
bipartite system. IBA is deriving guts to
reduce offer even on the day of strike. What does it mean ?
When millions of State , Central, Public Sector
Employees got fantastic wage revision at a huge burden to the public
exchequer why this partisan treatment to bank employees. If the answer to
this question may come through court THEN UFBU should explore that
possibility also as the balance sheets are sound and can absorb the wage
/pension burden . Let them say GOODBYE to this bipartite and seek
justice by engaging eminent juries. PATNA HIGH COURT TODAY DIRECTED THE GOVT
TO IMPLEMENT THE SIXTH PAY COMMISSION TO THE COURT EMPLOYEES.
Let them also say goodbye to the proposed march to Parliament against
banking reforms which is causing irritation to GOVT who wants to make some
reform in the banking sector. Accept some reforms like
consolidation and out sourcing etc which have direct impact on establishment
expenses. Unless and otherwise the attitude of the unions change nothing is
going to materialize as this blog will get letters and comments from the
frustrated bank men.
Salary increase since IV th pay commission is
because of the change in attitude of the government in favour of its
employees. That legacy is continuing and pouring as benefits. Money / load
will not be a constraint factor to the government if the attitude of UFBU
changes. If unions cooperate with the
government in implementing some of the reforms so as to please the world
bank, then government will automatically climb down, PM will intervene and
settle the issue. If we accept for merger then
it will be very good for all. No repetition of LEHMAN BROTHERS OR CITI BANK
ETC will happen in INDIA because we are governed by strong RBI policies.
This simple factor is very well known to both sides. If it appears to be a
compromise or a set back it has to accept the same in the overall interest
of bank employees and officers for betterment of the service conditions.
We once again take it for granted that even
congressmen will not accept complete reforms that may be proposed to the
dictate of the world bank. What ever possible wherever there is direct link
with the cost in the interest of the employees if it is the only way has to
be accepted. It need not be construed as surrender of right but the need of
the hour if government wants. If we are
not going to achieve parity now by sacrificing certain principles it will
never be achieved in future as DA INCREASES GAP ALSO WILL SUBSTANTIALLY GO
UP.
SO THE LEADERSHIP SHOULD ACT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE
AND SILENCE IS NOT THE ANSWER. FULL PACKAGE INCLUDING PENSION OPTION,
PENSION UPDATION, FULL NEUTRALIZATION WITHOUT CALCULATING LOAD IS POSSIBLE
IF UBFU STARTS A DIALOGUE ON REFORMS WITH IBA/GOVERNMENT.
4th November, 2009
|